.svg)
CASE RESULTS
$2,600,000
Verdict Against Tower Federal Credit Union
Obtained a $2.6 million verdict, plus attorneys’ fees, against Tower Federal Credit Union in Delaware in September 2026. The case involved a mixed credit file containing information belonging to an unrelated consumer, including incorrect addresses, false accounts and balances, and a failure to properly investigate disputes. The errors resulted in the consumer being unfairly denied the ability to purchase and benefit from a good credit rating, loss of the right to protect private financial information, an unfairly lowered credit rating, wasted time and money, and emotional distress.
$1,300,000
Verdict Against Rent Recovery, LLC
Obtained a $1.3 million verdict, plus attorneys’ fees, against Rent Recovery, LLC in Kansas in August 2026. The case involved repeatedly and falsely reporting a debt balance owed on a rental and failing to properly investigate disputes. The errors resulted in loss of credit and damage to creditworthiness, loss of purchasing ability, wasted time and money, and emotional distress.
$680,000
Verdict Against Samba Safety
Obtained a $680,000 verdict, plus attorneys’ fees, against Samba Safety in New Mexico in February 2026. The case involved an employment background check report that falsely reported a suspended license and a failure to properly investigate the error when it was disputed. The errors resulted in the consumer being deactivated as a driver from the Uber platform during prime tourist season and for an extended period of time, causing financial impacts and emotional distress.
$600,000
Judgment Against Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Obtained a $600,000 judgment, inclusive of attorneys’ fees, against Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation in a California case involving inaccurate reporting on multiple lease accounts. The reported errors included incorrect balances, lease terms, and account statuses, which were alleged to have contributed to a denied mortgage opportunity, reduced creditworthiness, and emotional distress.
$120,0000
Judgment Against LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Obtained a $120,000 judgment, inclusive of attorneys’ fees, against LexisNexis Risk Solutions in Florida in October 2025. The case involved a mixed credit file in an insurance background report that was mixed with the consumer’s twin, resulting in incorrect personal and identity details, false credit inquiries, and inaccurate accounts. The errors resulted in being unfairly denied the best car insurance rates from multiple carriers, worse loan terms to secure homeowners insurance, loss of the right to protect private financial information, damaged credit, loss of the ability to purchase based on credit standing, wasted time and money, and emotional distress.
$115,000
Judgement Against Equifax
Obtained a $115,000 judgment, plus attorneys’ fees, against Equifax Information Services LLC in Pennsylvania in August 2025. The case involved falsely reporting the consumer as deceased after his father, a joint account holder, passed away. Equifax continued reporting him as deceased for months, even after he disputed the error and the creditor corrected its own reporting, and falsely verified the information as accurate. The errors resulted in a denied mortgage application and the loss of a home purchase, a decreased credit score and creditworthiness, wasted time, and severe emotional distress.
$95,000
Verdict Against Experian
Obtained a $95,000 verdict, plus attorneys’ fees, against Experian in Texas in July 2026. The case involved a mixed credit file that combined the consumer’s information with his son’s, resulting in incorrect personal and identity details, false credit inquiries, and inaccurate accounts. The errors resulted in the consumer being unfairly denied access to credit to purchase a vehicle, furniture, and housing-related necessities, as well as emotional distress.
$85,000
Judgment Against Equifax
Obtained an $85,000 judgment, inclusive of attorneys’ fees, against Equifax in Pennsylvania in August 2025. The case involved inaccurate reporting about a prior loan debt, including falsely reporting it as a “charge off” account and falsely verifying the account as accurate when disputed. The errors resulted in an unfairly denied credit application, decreased credit score and creditworthiness, severe emotional distress, and wasted time.
$80,000
Judgment Against TransUnion
Obtained an $80,000 judgment, inclusive of attorneys’ fees, against TransUnion in Pennsylvania in August 2025. The case involved inaccurate reporting about a prior loan debt, including falsely reporting it as a “charge off” account and falsely verifying the account as accurate when disputed. The errors resulted in an unfairly denied credit application, decreased credit score and creditworthiness, severe emotional distress, and wasted time.
Disclaimer
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The outcome of each case depends on its own facts, including the type of error, how the company responded, and how the mistake affected the client.
FAQs
Yes. If the company failed to conduct a reasonable investigation after you disputed an error, or failed to maintain reasonable procedures to ensure accuracy in the first place, you may be able to recover damages.
Under the FCRA, you generally have 2 years from the date you discovered the error to file a lawsuit, and no more than 5 years from the date the violation happened. This time limit is called a statute of limitations, and once it passes, you may lose the right to recover anything. Some state laws have different deadlines, so it's worth getting your situation reviewed by a lawyer sooner rather than later.
Your consultation is always free, and if we take your case, you won't pay out-of-pocket or upfront fees. That's because the Fair Credit Reporting Act makes the company responsible for the error pay.
Every case moves at its own pace, so there's no single timeline. Some cases settle within a few months, while others take longer, especially if the case goes to trial. How quickly the company responds, how much evidence is available, and whether a court gets involved all affect timing. Your attorney can give you a clearer picture once they've reviewed your report and the company's response.
Yes, in many cases you can. Fixing the error going forward doesn't undo the harm it already caused, like a job you lost, an apartment that went to someone else, or months of higher interest payments. What matters is whether the company broke the law and whether the mistake cost you something while it was on your report. Save any records showing when the error appeared, when you found it, and what happened because of it.
Not necessarily, and no honest law firm can promise you one. Every case depends on its own facts, including the type of error, how the company responded to your dispute, and what the mistake cost you. These results show what's possible when a company gets your report wrong, not what you should expect. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
.png)
.svg)
